Showing posts with label work-life balance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label work-life balance. Show all posts

20.11.16

Digging the Corporate Dirt: A Day in the Life at a Global Conglomerate



It had come to be almost one hour before midnight. Immersed in the cold of a winter night that was reaching full strength, I sat in the dark, in a small spec of space not penetrated by the continuous movement of blue disco lights all around, and participated in card game with a heterogeneous group of men of varying ages and personal backgrounds, some of them known and others familiarly unknown. Heightening the overpowering atmosphere, the reverberations of the latest dance numbers bombarded not only our ears but our entire bodies. This, however, wasn't a nightclub.

This was routine, part of the ride I had to take for my daily commute from the office to my bed. A commonplace affair, the company sent a mini-bus to transport its employees, and this was the natural result. Our young bus driver sped recklessly through the streets, ignoring the painted lanes for the most part just so he might, if at all possible, grab enough sleep before he had to wake up to do it all over again for the employees of the next shift.



The chaos mesmerized me into an introspected state of deep thinking. I tried analyzing my newly embarked journey as a finance professional, a small cog within one of the largest conglomerates that has ever existed. Armed with two postgraduate degrees, I had entered the job market with an energetic hope as well as very high expectations. As the months evaporated before my eyes noticed, I became painfully aware that this reality did not resemble even a tiny fraction of what I had envisioned when I had graduated. And, to be frank, it had taken its toll on me, both physically and mentally. Exhausted, absorbed, and unfulfilled, a monotonous lifestyle had already overpowered me, as if with the commanding attraction of a siren. I could barely visualize a worthwhile future for myself anymore. How had I become a shell, a husk, a body moving asleep; how did it occur so quickly and without warning?

A coworker and I used to share the last row of the bus, perhaps in an unwitting attempt to hide, flee, or resist the overpowering ambiance within the mini-bus in order to preserve some peace of mind as our days came to a close. A senior professional, he had spent more than a decade in a similar industry. Perhaps strangely, we never spoke much, only chitchat related to our daily card game, a game which I initially hesitated to become involved in as I had never played earlier and I find that type of indulgence to be a waste of time. Our relation to one another had an alienated character, and on this particular day we were just having a short-lived chat about work. He was surprised to learn about my credentials and the kind of jobs I had had in the past. As our conversation moved along, I gradually opened up, sharing the misery that had been fermenting inside because, in part, the feeling that the day-to-day activity simply did not meet my expectations. Possessing only the hope of being listened to, to my surprise he countered with a short story that I shall remember until the day I die.

He began plainly enough by asking—"Have you seen a chicken?" Taken aback by the silly question, suddenly a feeling of being the object of mockery sunk in. Nevertheless, having been ambushed and considering his experience and age, the naive reply—"Yes, who hasn't?"—became all I could utter. He again asked me—"Have you ever noticed what they eat?" I was in disbelief, cursing myself for not keeping my mouth shut like always. Unwillingly, I replied again—"No. But they eat grains, I believe." He said—"Exactly! A chicken on a farm has access to free movement, and you would find it always moving around places you may consider unhygienic for a human. But these chickens, no matter where they wander, even if it has to be a pile of dirt, would end up consuming the grains from the dirt."


Chicken digs through dirt to find nourishment
A rooster pecks at the dirt in the hopes that some grains
may be found so that it may nourish itself,


Perplexed, my mind wondered aimlessly yet determined to find sense in something so senseless. He must have noticed.

"This world is a large playground where you will encounter people of all kinds, opportunities of all types and situations of all difficulty levels. They will try to test you and get you thinking. But you need to realize that not all people you encounter would be your friends, not all opportunities you see might lead to a gold mine, and not all situations that you might encounter would be in your favor. You need to realize that you will always be offered a pile of dirt with gems hidden somewhere within that might fulfill your demands. But the real challenge is that you have to keep looking in this pile of dirt."

The world will offer this unhealthy dung heap every time, yet I can't help but feel that not every pile contains gems, no matter how much one struggles inside these to find them.

Some birds do best when they stop searching in circles and move on to look elsewhere. I no longer work there.

Still, even though I feel that I lost a part of my life, of myself, riding that minivan and struggling at what is to all eyes the ideal first job in the private sector, I learned a valuable lesson. Sometimes you dig deeper; sometimes you jump elsewhere. Success doesn't lie in the eyes of others. It is of utmost importance to struggle harder, so long as you don't lose your health and happiness in the process since losing either invariably leads to losing the other. This world has infinite grains and millions of gems, but you won't ever live this present again. Make sure you live it first.

Some rooster may end up living a long life where they get to breed and explore their surroundings. Other roosters end up with another, less fortunate fate.

A packet to make spicy cock flavored soup
Sold all over the English speaking Antilles,
Grace's cock flavoured soup mix comes in many
forms, the above being spicy.


27.5.16

Digression: What's New, or Why I suddenly stopped responding...



You may notice a few changes. Or you may have noticed that I suddenly disappeared. Either way, the following information seems pertinent.


Tattoo of HTML tags on the back of the head of a Columbian hacker that rigged many elections
Tattoo of HTML tags on the back of the head
of a Columbian hacker that rigged many elections
over a decade throughout Latin America.  He currently
sleeps with a bulletproof jacket under a bulletproof
blanket under solitary confinement in a maximum security
prison in Colombia, this being the only way
he can stay alive while cooperating with law-enforcement
authorities there.  At present, this picture is being used as
Cognitive Dynamics' Facebook and Twitter account pictures.


What's New






  • A new Google-powered Custom Search has been implemented on this site, appearing twice on every page.  I highly advise that you use this filtered search, be it whenever you are trying to find a solid answer to a concrete question, or in cases that involve the finding of research, data, historical facts, or pieces of art.  I took great pains to filter out all the nonsensical "bullshit" that comes with a normal search on Google or any other search engine.  I am still both expanding and limiting this CSE (Custom Search Engine) such that I welcome any and all suggestions on your part as to how it could or should be improved. 

  • I substantively expanded the article covering the Lüscher Color Test, adding a further variation on the test, which brings the total to three.  I have almost finished massive expansions to the Attachment Style test article as well as to the Enneagram of Personality test article and the Defense Style Questionnaire.  These expansions are much larger than the one done to the Luscher's color assessment and contain solid psychological research as well as links that provide the likely associations between specific Attachment Styles, Enneagram Types, Myers-Briggs types, Defense Mechanisms, and some important scales on the MMPI-2.  They should all be up this week.  Soon afterwards, an expansion to the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator article will be published.  All these will be published as new articles, thereby supplanting and taking offline the prior html addresses.

  • Blogger has shifted all sites into the more secure https format, which possesses a stronger encryption than normal http addresses.  HTTPS addresses were always available for every country's version of Cognitive Dynamics, yet these are no longer alternative addresses but rather the canonical ones.  The same applies to WWW containing addresses, which also always existed but were and will still be alternative addresses.  To keep it simple: the canonical address of this website is now https://cognitivedynamics.blogspot.com

  • AddThis buttons have been added to all pages.  After much coding, I got them to work for Blogger, which is hard since blogspot websites use a single HTML template for all versions of all articles in about 200 different addresses.  Please use these buttons to share the content of this site.  If you run into any problems using these buttons, I would appreciate it if you let me know so I may fix the issue.


To anyone I left waiting: Why I suddenly disappeared


Ever since the intelligence community leaks over the past decade, it has become apparent that no privacy currently exists and that all communications of any sort, be it over the phone or on the Internet, are recorded and have always been recorded by sectors of the Federal Government of the United States.

I would apologize for making everyone wait except that it was largely not my fault.  Prior to a month ago, we had been noticing for a long time two undesirable eavesdroppers constantly clinging to our supposedly secure home network.  Though no communications are secure or have ever been, it is one thing to know that you are being monitored and quite another to actually be able to witness it as it happens to you, as it has been occurring to me for at least a year and a half even though I have done absolutely nothing wrong except, apparently, that I did my postgraduate Cognitive Science work too well.  And this represents some sort of national security threat?  All I do is help people!

Though we could see these two undesirable accounts, whenever we would dig a little deeper, these would literally disappear at that very moment, crash the network, only to reappear immediately afterwards.  Personally, I've learned to live with this sort of thing since it began to happen to me long before I began this website.  I knew that, if I went ahead and threw out the accounts from our home network, something bad would happen.  However, after speaking to the future mother of my soon-to-be born first child, the decision was made to throw them out.  [Yes, I will very probably be a father in a few months. :) ]  The very moment the accounts were negated access, my computer stopped working.  It took me 3 weeks and about 7 hard-drive formats to regain the computer I use to work, and even then it still showed up with a sophisticated root-kit virus (which - you may rightly guess - should not be able to happen... but did!) that hopefully is no longer present, though I would not bet on it.

After burning out my brain getting this computer to work again, you may understand why I didn't immediately get back to work.  I needed time to recoup, to get my head on straight.

Luckily, I will be getting some help soon, which should be of great service insofar as getting new content out to you all on a more regular basis. In the meantime, I will answer everyone's long-standing queries as time permits.


Coming Soon!


  1. More articles with a higher variety of topics.

  2. Tuning of all existing articles, with greater intra-linking and more associated information.

  3. The rest of the articles about how to interpret your own MMPI-2 scores.

  4. Separate About and Privacy Policy pages (containing information on Cookies being employed), among several others, will be added.

  5. And the crown jewel: An original, new, encompassing personality test that will include features of all the test to provide a tailor-made personality assessment that goes beyond archetypes and clinical diagnosis and presents a concrete description over and beyond types and tendencies of psychopathology.

So please stay tuned... bear with me. It has been everything except easy to run this site, help people, create custom code and original content all by myself.  Unless something harmful and unexpected happens, this will change very soon.

Thank you for your time and patience.  The many kind words I have received have made it all worth it.


30.4.16

Free Luscher Color Test: Description, Instructions, & Online Variations



Developed by Dr. Max Lüscher, at a Swiss psychotherapist, at the early age of 23, the Lüscher Color Test or Lüscher Color Diagnostics asks the test taker to choose between eight colors in the order of how good these feel at that very point in time. Preferences for these colors when it comes to things like cars, clothing, or accessories ought to be disregarded; what matters is how these colors make you feel or how much you like them intuitively upon looking at them. What are or have been your favorite colors does not matter. After selecting an order, the participant should take a small pause before the test requests that the very same exercise be repeated. The repetition is very important and variance between the two rounds provides a lot of the information that the test produces. Personally, I close my eyes as I click to go into the second round and, upon opening them, make my best attempt to choose quickly solely through instinct.

Carrying out this test should not take longer than 2 minutes, that is, the test taker ought to choose impulsively, based on gut feelings, without trying to replicate first-round choices or over-thinking the exercise, its point, or what possible meanings the colors may have. Links to three versions are provided below.


Though I know exactly how the algorithm works, I have chosen not to explain it here or provide a link to any detailed information regarding how the results are obtained.  My reason for not providing the information is that this test has the very peculiar characteristic that it can be taken an infinite amount of times at different points in one's life and each result may prove insightful as to how you feel and what you require (in this sense, you may take it as often as you want to, just don't try to fool yourself by doing so twice in a row unless your state of mind and how your body feel has changed).  Knowing how the algorithm works makes this harder; I still take the test from time to time, putting effort into disregarding what I know, but I find it hard to do so even if still possible.

If you want to know how the results are calculated, please leave a note in the Comments section below or contact me privately through any other means and I will provide it to you directly.


Luscher Color Test: The psychology of the semantics of each color is pivotal for semiotics
Photo of colored cards, placed side by side, used in the Lüscher Color Test.
Different versions may carry different colors, but one thing that is often noted
of the traditional version is that the red in the test isn't really red, it is orange,
and the blue is a navy blue, and the green is a dark green, as seen in the next image.



Screenshot of a selection round in a free, online version of the Lüscher Color Test
Colors available in the traditional Luscher Color Test, available online
for free (first link below).  The colors themselves never vary, but on-screen
position always does.  Both selection rounds look like this screenshot.

This test was created while Max Lüscher worked a Human Resources job that required him to screen potential applicants. That is part of what it does, but it is not really what it does; in fact, more often than not, it does not provide insight into a person's job potential and their tendencies for carrying out assigned tasks. Nevertheless, like the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI; click to test yourself) and Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI-2; click to take the test), the Lüscher Color Test is used sometimes for screening job applicants, though much less often.

A published research article — Holmes, C.B., Wurtz, P.J., Waln, R.F., Dungan, D.S., and Joseph, C.A. (1984). "Relationship Between the Luscher Color Test and the MMPI". Journal of Clinical Psychology 40(1), January: 126-128. — used a tiny sample of 42 graduate students to compare MMPI-2 and Luscher Color Test results and found little relation between the two. Since the MMPI-2 (click here its history) is regarded as the best profiling tool available, the authors argued that the Luscher Color Test ought to be used with caution if at all. Even though I do not agree with the foundations underlying the way color semantics are established in Lüscher's procedure (see Sidenote below), I understand that paper's conclusion to be mistaken because it relies on the presupposition that both tests attempt to measure the same thing: a person's personality. But these tests don't measure the same things, and people don't really have set personalities, as any good military branch or Department of Defense around the world can attest to based on their experience screening people for certain type of operations or for ascertaining whether someone is trustworthy enough to received Classified or Top Secret information.

The MMPI-2, the Myers-Briggs Type Inventory, the Enneagram Personality Test (click to take the test), and the Luscher Color Test all look at different aspects of a person's behavior, different components if you will. Even the Defense Style Questionnaire, which is not a personality test, can reveal an important facet of a person's "personality" that none of the other tests can readily tell you. I am currently working on an article where the differences in what is measured is explained systematically in a clear model, and I am hoping to integrate all the results into its own overarching algorithm that provides a better profile than any of these tests considered by itself. (But, as you may imagine, creating such a program is quite hard. I will update this post once that article is finished... and hopefully the program too.) For the time being, it may be enough to note that the Lüscher Color Test provides, at best, some insight into a person's current state of mind. Test-retest variations can ultimately be even more productive as patterns emerge in tendencies. I've seen from experience that the results other people get are almost always things that I have never gotten, and viceversa. The Anxiety and Compulsiveness scales received via the first link are of particular note as the tendencies emerge.






Of the three free, online versions provided below, the first is the most complete, being the only one that gives the information that Human Resources people are looking for. The third is mostly click-bait to sell their test, manuals and procedures, but I have chosen to link to it anyway because it provides a different way altogether of doing the test (e.g., no second round), even if it has the fatal programming flaw that some configurations that fail to produce any information.  The first and second links provided are to versions that produce the same basic categories of results:
  1. Existing Situation
  2. Stress Sources 
  3. Restrained Characteristics
  4. Desired Objective
  5. Actual Problems
The first version of the test provided below further divides the Stress Sources into three sections:
  1. Physiological
  2. Psychological
  3. In Brief
"In Brief" very succinctly paraphrases the result within the two preceding divisions. Furthermore, in contrast to the second link provided, the algorithm of the first link generates four additional categories:
  1. Ambivalence (if applicable)
  2. Approach to Work (if applicable)
  3. Anxiety (degree of which is numbered on a scale from 0 to 6)
  4. Compulsiveness of Compensations (numbered level on a scale from 0 to 6)
The second link's algorithm is far more verbal than both the first and third, providing a longer description; however, there are recurring problems with the algorithm, mainly in the areas of faulty grammar and orthography and the fact that it often repeats propositions, but all in all it is still pretty sound and sometimes the repetition is meaningful. The only reason the first test does not fall into the same problems is because it simplifies the written structure and requests of the user to replace gender whenever necessary. The Luscher Color Test is gender-neutral insofar as the results it affords such that asking the user to change the gender in their minds if necessary is of no real consequence.

Warning: You are probably going to find your results depressing. Results are problem-oriented and apply to your present situation. These psychological diagnostic programs are inferential engines that try to assess the different aspects of the situation you currently find yourself in.  They take into account your current preference and your current stance regarding your situation, as well as your life objectives and the manner in which you are dealing with your current problems. The image below is an example of the results provided through the third link, which are much simpler (and has many less possible configurations, of which at least one is bugged and shows no information at all) than those provided by the programs in the first two links.

Screenshot of results of a limited Lüscher Color Test carried out through a different testing procedure and including different colors
Click to Enlarge.
Example of results of the most basic Luscher Color Test provided
in the links below. Both the testing procedure and the colors
themselves are different in that version; hence, it is worth trying it.

Because of the amount of color combinations possible, the first two Lüscher Color Test provided will always provide variations, unless you answer in the exact same way, which would be highly unusual. This test is best used as a guide, not a diagnostic mechanism. However, as a guide, it is good to take it again as your moods change to explore how your perspective and context has changed and what would be the best way to approach the new scenario that you are in.

Sidenote: I do not agree with the underlying psychology or philosophy of the test. The test relies on universalized assumptions that color preferences have a strong innate component related to archetypes, a view that I do not agree with. The test has also faced serious objections from psychological investigations. Nevertheless, though it shouldn't be taken as a diagnostic, I have found it to be extremely helpful in clarifying some key aspects of my moods and bodily states as these shift and shape a new perspective with regards to the existing context. Besides, the very same objections apply to the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (click for history and assessment of its reliability), the Keirsey Temperament Sorter (download a journal article with history, explanation, and reliability assessment), the Enneagram Personality Test (click for journal article regarding reliability and applications), and almost every other profiling test currently available, a topic I will address in a future post. Therefore, I still invite you to make use of it, but in a responsible manner.

To summarize, none of the personality tests that exist do what they claim to do - describe your personality. In this respect I particularly despise the Keirsey Temperament Sorter, which actually makes the MBTI less accurate. However, the problem isn't in the tests themselves, rather in what they claim to do. All these tests, even the MMPI-2, fail to realize that personality are just tendencies within larger teleological decision-making processes that are almost entirely based on constraint-satisfaction neural networks and usually context-dependent. Explaining where each of the pieces measured by each test fits in - and providing a logical formalization of - the larger model will be my next large task here at Cognitive Dynamics.

In the meantime, go ahead -
Take the (Highly Recommended)

Lüscher Color Test


Or try

the Color Quiz!


Or finally, to variation's sake, try the more basic (and bugged)

Lüscher Color Diagnostics




------------------

Other psychological personality tests you may enjoy:


Attachment Style Test (New article, with complete theory, dynamics, and free copies of the DSM V and ICD-10!)

The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator

The Enneagram Personality Test

The Defense Style Questionnaire

---------------------

Related articles you may enjoy:



28.11.15

Mortals of Habit: Dying by - and the Death of - the 40 Hour Workweek


Creatures of habit that we are, we seldom revamp things that have been around since before we were born.  An example is the 8-hour workday.  Since when has it been around?  The eight-hour movement,or 40-hour movement, has its origins in the workers' struggles of the Industrial Revolution.  Karl Marx saw its vital importance to the workers' health, saying in Das Kapital: "By extending the working day, therefore, capitalist production [...] not only produces a deterioration of human labour power by robbing it of its normal moral and physical conditions of development and activity, but also produces the premature exhaustion and death of this labour power itself”. Studies have showed that working 8 hours is not ultimately productive.  Evan Robinson recently wrote - "working over 21 hours continuously is equivalent to being legally drunk. Longer periods of continuous work drastically reduce cognitive function and increase the chance of catastrophic error."



When discussing in HR circles, people will agree on the data and its conclusions, but do HR departments plan on executing a plan making a day more productive that is less conventional?  No. Sweden, in some attempt at reform and finding work-life balance, just switched to a 6-hour workday (or see here, or better here for an explanation).

Conventionality has been the killer of many great ideas. The great unknown has been terrifying traditional types for eons.  As I write this, I am standing up.  I’ve never considered being able to stand up and write.  Not because I didn’t think it wasn’t possible, it just didn’t cross my mind.  The fact that I have access to that option makes me want to try it.  If you are expecting me to say that is better than sitting down, I am sorry to disappoint.  It is not; it is simply different.  But different is what you need sometimes, and sometimes you just need your good ol’ chair.

The point I am trying to make is that there are so many ways to go through our day. There are exponential alternatives on how to structure our day, our time, and our life. So many people are looking for adventure or, when asked what they seek in their significant other, they say someone adventurous. If that were really true, why wouldn’t they take a different way home? That’s adventurous, even if on a smaller scale than what they may have envisioned. Instead of going home after work, take a scenic route or improvise a road trip to the next state over. We don’t do any of these. Well, I try not to do it.   It upsets my family, and I don’t want them to seriously consider placing a tracking chip on me, even though this would avoid driving and texting to notify them of my whereabouts, thereby making the road a much safer place because I am not swerving and trying to be grammatically correct at the same time. Now I am going on a tangent...

I am just tired of discussing and having studies show us how we can improve on our day yet nothing revolutionary happen. The graph below shows the relationship between productivity and annual hours worked.



A paper by John Pencavel implies that reducing working hours is good for productivity.

Don’t get me wrong. I think it is great that IKEA sells standing-up desks. That’s something. But I am still holding out on the 4 hour work days. Or, perhaps, we may see a Basic Living Wage implemented in our lifetimes, with recent pieces such as this one by Scott Santers making the point forcefully based on new research by the IMF and OECD.  Perhaps the time has come for some real change that redefines the position of labor in our societies in a way that strikes a better work-life balance.  I can hope.  Can't I?

12.9.15

Take the Enneagram Personality Test


An Enneagram of Personality is a typology of nine interconnected personality types.  An Enneagram Personality test is similar to the Myers-Briggs Personality Test with the exception that it views the types as connected to one another in specific ways.  Like the Myers-Briggs, it is often used in business for recruiting purposes in order to build teams with members that complement one another instead of overlap and also to reduce conflict within the team.

The Enneagram of Personality looks like this:



There are different types of Enneagram tests.  The following link leads to one of the simplest and most fun versions of the test.  Enjoy!





Take the Enneagram Personality Test!


------------------
Other psychological personality tests you may enjoy:

Attachment Style Test (New article, with complete theory, dynamics, and free copies of the DSM V and ICD-10!)

The Defense Style Questionnaire

Featured Original:

How You Know What You Know

In a now classic paper, Blakemore and Cooper (1970) showed that if a newborn cat is deprived of experiences with horizontal lines (i.e., ...